Simple Smart Seminar
  • Stock
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Tech News
  • Editor’s Pick
Editor's PickInvesting

If Reciprocal Trade Barrier Reductions Are the Goal, Free Trade Agreements Are the Solution

by April 22, 2025
April 22, 2025 0 comment

Colin Grabow

trump tariff

Earlier this month, President Trump paused his “Liberation Day” tariffs, citing an alleged desire from over 75 (unnamed) countries to launch negotiations on a range of trade-related issues. An optimistic interpretation is that the move confirms Trump’s use of tariffs as a cage-rattling tactic designed to secure improved trade deals. Short-term tariff pain will lead to long-term gains through the lowering and removal of foreign trade barriers.

Such thinking holds that while Trump’s methods may be highly unorthodox, they will ultimately produce a freer trade environment.

Even (generously) assuming this is the ardent protectionist’s goal, however, Trump’s approach is deeply flawed. Whatever is ultimately achieved in terms of reduced tariffs and trade barriers could be more easily obtained through free trade agreements.

To understand why, let’s first take stock of the enormous damage already inflicted. Uncertainty is up and business confidence is down as markets have been whipsawed and intricate supply chains imperiled. And there’s no end in sight. Indeed, additional tariffs might be on the way. 

Just getting back to the tariff starting line will be no easy task.

If over 75 countries desire negotiations, that means over 75 negotiations must be concluded. That takes time. Bilateral free trade deals usually require 18 months, and even a US-Japan “mini-deal” covering 5 percent of bilateral trade took six months. Although President Trump claims he could wrap up the deals in a single day, this would almost certainly entail significant compromises on the scope of discussions.

Indeed, Sen. Bill Hagerty (R‑TN) recently said the deals might merely consist of written commitments from foreign governments to make various reforms. Aggressive tariff and trade barrier reductions would be unlikely, providing a meager return on President Trump’s costly approach.

Fortunately, there’s a more effective, expansive, and less disruptive way of securing lowered tariffs and trade barriers. Rather than hurling tariff thunderbolts to get the attention of US trade partners, President Trump should invite them to negotiate free trade agreements (FTAs).

FTAs aren’t new. Indeed, since signing its first such agreement (with Israel) in 1985, the United States has concluded FTAs covering 20 countries. Under such agreements, signatories agree to reduce their tariffs and other trade barriers (see chart) covering substantially all trade with certain limited exceptions. The reductions are reciprocal, and all sides agree on a common set of rules.

The Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), an agreement that the United States signed with eleven other countries in 2016 but withdrew from shortly after President Trump took office in 2017, offers a good example. Under the agreement, later implemented without the United States as the Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), 99 percent of tariffs among member countries are eliminated.

Vietnam was among the CPTPP member countries where US goods and services would enjoy substantially improved access had the United States ratified the agreement. Although Hanoi (targeted by the US with 46 percent “reciprocal” tariffs) and the Trump administration may very well end up striking a deal that includes Vietnam’s removal or reduction of some trade barriers, it will almost certainly pale in comparison with what was agreed to under the TPP/CPTTP.

The bilateral US-South Korea Free Trade Agreement (KORUS) offers another example. Entering into force in 2012, the FTA eliminated 98 percent of tariffs over ten years. This included big wins for US exporters, such as South Korea eliminating its 8 percent tariffs on autos and auto parts (equivalent US tariffs were also eliminated from a previous 2.5 percent rate). US consumers and businesses, meanwhile, also benefited from tariff-free access to Korean consumer products and intermediate goods such as machinery. 

What deal could the Trump administration realistically strike that would improve on what the KORUS had already achieved?

To be sure, FTAs have their downsides. As such deals require congressional approval, they are subject to the same rent-seeking, special carve-outs, and favor-granting that bedevil all manners of legislation (overzealous intellectual property rights contained in the TPP come to mind). These, of course, should be resisted. Overall, however, (as shown in the Cato Institute’s TPP analysis), the gains produced by such agreements outweigh their pitfalls. 

FTAs also typically aren’t quick or easy. Negotiations are often dragged-out affairs (the TPP took eight years to negotiate) that occur well outside the limelight. The pomp and circumstance of a signing ceremony would be some way off. But such drawbacks are small beer compared to the chaos and increasing economic fallout of the administration’s current approach.

All of this assumes, of course, that President Trump is truly interested in a legacy of freer trade and expanded international commerce—a proposition that appears increasingly doubtful. If he wants to prove his doubters wrong, secure truly reciprocal trade barrier reductions, and showcase his savvy at the negotiating table. The FTA path awaits.

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
previous post
New York City Corruption
next post
‘Let us be the parents’: Supreme Court should let parents opt kids out of LGBTQ school lessons, lawyer argues

You may also like

Week Ahead: As NIFTY Breaks Out, Change Of...

June 28, 2025

3 Stock Setups for the Second Half of...

June 27, 2025

Fibonacci Retracements: The Key to Identifying True Breakouts

June 27, 2025

A Disappointing Supreme Court Decision Weakens Online First...

June 27, 2025

Brazil’s Supreme Court Rewrites the Rules to Censor...

June 27, 2025

The Supreme Court Is Right on Reading Opt-Outs,...

June 27, 2025

Friday Feature: Savannah Legacy Academy

June 27, 2025

All-Time Highs and An Upcoming Rate Cut: We’re...

June 27, 2025

Don’t Give Big Businesses Immunity from Litigation

June 27, 2025

Unmasking Medicaid Money-Laundering Schemes: Medicaid Financing Gimmicks 101

June 27, 2025

    Fill Out & Get More Relevant News


    Stay ahead of the market and unlock exclusive trading insights & timely news. We value your privacy - your information is secure, and you can unsubscribe anytime. Gain an edge with hand-picked trading opportunities, stay informed with market-moving updates, and learn from expert tips & strategies.

    Recent Posts

    • Week Ahead: As NIFTY Breaks Out, Change Of Leadership Likely To Keep The Index Moving

      June 28, 2025
    • 3 Stock Setups for the Second Half of 2025

      June 27, 2025
    • Fibonacci Retracements: The Key to Identifying True Breakouts

      June 27, 2025
    • All-Time Highs and An Upcoming Rate Cut: We’re Just Getting Started on This Move Higher

      June 27, 2025
    • How to Improve your Trading Odds and Increase Opportunities

      June 27, 2025
    • NEW! 5 Significant Additions to Our Professionally-Curated Market Summary Dashboard

      June 26, 2025
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Copyright © 2025 simplesmartseminar.com | All Rights Reserved

    Simple Smart Seminar
    • Stock
    • Investing
    • Politics
    • Tech News
    • Editor’s Pick