Simple Smart Seminar
  • Stock
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Tech News
  • Editor’s Pick
Editor's PickInvesting

The Government Uses “Standing” Doctrine to Evade Judicial Review

by April 22, 2025
April 22, 2025 0 comment

Thomas A. Berry, Brent Skorup, and Christine Marsden

EPA

Under the Clean Air Act, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) may grant a special waiver to the state of California to combat environmental concerns specific to California, such as smog in Los Angeles. But over the last fifteen years, the EPA has used that limited waiver process to empower California regulators to address global climate change through strict vehicle emissions and electric car mandates that bind all US automakers.

Diamond Alternative Energy and other producers of liquid fuel sued to block the enforcement of one such EPA waiver. They filed declarations explaining that California’s strict mandates would cause fewer fuel-producing cars to be sold, depressing fuel sales and harming the fuel producers financially. However, the DC Circuit concluded that it was not enough to articulate these predictable effects of coercive regulations. The court held that the fuel producers had failed to demonstrate that vacating the EPA waiver would increase fuel purchases. The court thus reasoned that the fuel producers had not proven that blocking the waiver would “redress” their injury. On that basis, the court dismissed the case for a lack of standing.

The fuel producers asked the Supreme Court to review their case, and the Court granted that request. Now, Cato has filed an amicus brief in support of Diamond Alternative Energy.

In our brief, we highlight lower courts’ misuse of standing doctrines to dismiss meritorious, viable challenges to government regulation. Indeed, we recently fell victim to the DC Circuit’s dubious standing requirements in a First Amendment case against a federal agency, Cato Institute v. SEC (2021).

Standing doctrine is meant to ensure that federal cases hinge on real conflicts, to prevent “turning judges into advice columnists.” However, judges’ application of modern standing doctrine bears little resemblance to the historical requirements derived from the Constitution’s Case or Controversy Clause of Article III.

The DC Circuit’s decision in this case illustrates that standing doctrine is too often used as an arbitrary barrier, blocking the courthouse doors to parties who have genuine legal grievances. In this case, the fuel producers unquestionably have a valid interest in blocking the waiver. Although California’s regulations bind vehicle manufacturers, those manufacturers are not the sole targets of the regulations. California has been explicit about its desire to reduce the use of fuel through the passage of emissions regulations.

The Supreme Court found in Department of Commerce v. New York (2019) that the “predictable effects” of a regulation can be used to establish standing. The fuel producers logically argue that strict emissions rules will depress demand for their products, thus harming their economic interests. That should be enough to show a redressable injury and establish standing.

Overly strict applications of standing doctrine are not just inconsistent with the original meaning of the Constitution, they are also inconsistent with established precedent. The Supreme Court should reverse the DC Circuit so that the courts below will finally consider the legal challenge to EPA’s waiver on the merits.

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
previous post
Food Freedom Is Personal Freedom—A Personal Crusade Should Not Become National Policy
next post
As REAL ID rollout approaches, congressional privacy hawks largely silent on concerns

You may also like

Week Ahead: As NIFTY Breaks Out, Change Of...

June 28, 2025

3 Stock Setups for the Second Half of...

June 27, 2025

Fibonacci Retracements: The Key to Identifying True Breakouts

June 27, 2025

A Disappointing Supreme Court Decision Weakens Online First...

June 27, 2025

Brazil’s Supreme Court Rewrites the Rules to Censor...

June 27, 2025

The Supreme Court Is Right on Reading Opt-Outs,...

June 27, 2025

Friday Feature: Savannah Legacy Academy

June 27, 2025

All-Time Highs and An Upcoming Rate Cut: We’re...

June 27, 2025

Don’t Give Big Businesses Immunity from Litigation

June 27, 2025

Unmasking Medicaid Money-Laundering Schemes: Medicaid Financing Gimmicks 101

June 27, 2025

    Fill Out & Get More Relevant News


    Stay ahead of the market and unlock exclusive trading insights & timely news. We value your privacy - your information is secure, and you can unsubscribe anytime. Gain an edge with hand-picked trading opportunities, stay informed with market-moving updates, and learn from expert tips & strategies.

    Recent Posts

    • Week Ahead: As NIFTY Breaks Out, Change Of Leadership Likely To Keep The Index Moving

      June 28, 2025
    • 3 Stock Setups for the Second Half of 2025

      June 27, 2025
    • Fibonacci Retracements: The Key to Identifying True Breakouts

      June 27, 2025
    • All-Time Highs and An Upcoming Rate Cut: We’re Just Getting Started on This Move Higher

      June 27, 2025
    • How to Improve your Trading Odds and Increase Opportunities

      June 27, 2025
    • NEW! 5 Significant Additions to Our Professionally-Curated Market Summary Dashboard

      June 26, 2025
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Copyright © 2025 simplesmartseminar.com | All Rights Reserved

    Simple Smart Seminar
    • Stock
    • Investing
    • Politics
    • Tech News
    • Editor’s Pick