Simple Smart Seminar
  • Stock
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Tech News
  • Editor’s Pick
Editor's PickInvesting

SCOTUS Decision Against Religious Charter Is Right, But We Must Address Discrimination Against Religion

by May 22, 2025
May 22, 2025 0 comment

Neal McCluskey

In a decision that surprised me in its rapidity, but not its outcome, the Supreme Court deadlocked four to four, leaving in place an Oklahoma Supreme Court decision against the creation of a Roman Catholic cyber charter school. The tie vote was possible because Justice Amy Coney Barrett recused herself from the case, likely because she is close friends with Nicole Stelle Garnett, the University of Notre Dame law professor who was instrumental in moving the case forward. While the case should elicit conflicted emotions for anyone who desires freedom and equality in education, the charter school going down was probably the right outcome.

Why right? Petitioners were correct that a charter excluding religious options, but at least theoretically allowing all others, discriminates against religious Americans. But chartering is too government-entangling a way to fix the problem. A charter school is a public school typically approved to exist by a government entity such as a state board, and that is too much government control. Chief Justice John Roberts, who was the likely conservative swing vote, addressed that concern directly in oral arguments, saying, “This does strike me as a much more comprehensive involvement” than school choice programs that allow families to use public funds at private schools, the subjects of much of the precedent cited by petitioners.

It is inherently dangerous to put the government in the position to declare, “This proposed religious school is OK, and this one is not.”

Because the decision was a tie, it sets no legal precedent, but it does send a message: Charter schooling is likely not the right way, legally, to address very real discrimination against religion by our public education system. The solution, as I have argued and as precedent points to, is private school choice, at least constitutionally required for religious families.

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
previous post
New book exposes how top Biden comms staffer was ‘tip of the spear’ covering up Biden’s cognitive decline
next post
Four Things the Senate Can Do to Improve the House Tax Bill

You may also like

Week Ahead: NIFTY Set To Stay In A...

July 5, 2025

From Oversold to Opportunity: Small Caps on the...

July 3, 2025

Bank Capital Standards

July 3, 2025

Psychedelic Legalization

July 3, 2025

Freedom of Speech Is Worth Celebrating, as Europe...

July 3, 2025

Money’s Not Leaving the Market — It’s Rotating!

July 3, 2025

Expanding Federal Involvement in Education Isn’t the Way...

July 3, 2025

American Craft Brewers Suffering Under Trump’s Tariffs

July 3, 2025

More NYC Corruption

July 3, 2025

Trump’s “Unimpeachable” Reputation

July 3, 2025

    Fill Out & Get More Relevant News


    Stay ahead of the market and unlock exclusive trading insights & timely news. We value your privacy - your information is secure, and you can unsubscribe anytime. Gain an edge with hand-picked trading opportunities, stay informed with market-moving updates, and learn from expert tips & strategies.

    Recent Posts

    • Week Ahead: NIFTY Set To Stay In A Defined Range Unless These Levels Are Taken Out; Drags Support Higher

      July 5, 2025
    • From Oversold to Opportunity: Small Caps on the Move

      July 3, 2025
    • Money’s Not Leaving the Market — It’s Rotating!

      July 3, 2025
    • Missed Disney’s Rally? Grab This Defined-Risk Put Spread for a Second Chance

      July 2, 2025
    • Should You Buy Roblox Stock Now? Key Levels to Watch

      July 2, 2025
    • MACD Crossovers: Why Most Traders Get It Wrong

      July 2, 2025
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Copyright © 2025 simplesmartseminar.com | All Rights Reserved

    Simple Smart Seminar
    • Stock
    • Investing
    • Politics
    • Tech News
    • Editor’s Pick