Simple Smart Seminar
  • Stock
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Tech News
  • Editor’s Pick
Editor's PickInvesting

Government-funded Research Published in Government-funded Journals—What Could Go Wrong?

by May 28, 2025
May 28, 2025 0 comment

Jeffrey A. Singer

science research

Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., told listeners on the “Ultimate Human” podcast yesterday that he might prevent government researchers from publishing their findings in the prestigious medical journals, according to the Washington Post.

Kennedy singled out The Lancet, the New England Journal of Medicine, and JAMA (the Journal of the American Medical Association), labeling them corrupt and “under the control of the pharmaceutical industry.” He expressed his desire for the Department of HHS to establish its own journals and stated that the government would require researchers it funds to publish their findings exclusively in those journals. On the podcast, Kennedy noted that these journals will, by definition, be preeminent, “because if you get [NIH] funding, it is anointing you as a good, legitimate scientist.”

Let’s set aside the question of whether independent and prestigious medical journals are susceptible to the influence of pharmaceutical companies. What can we expect to occur when political appointees (e.g., the directors of the National Institutes of Health and the Food and Drug Administration) decide how to allocate taxpayer money for research aimed at advancing the government’s scientific agenda, which will subsequently be peer-reviewed and published in government journals?

The saying goes, “Whoever funds the music sets the melody.” In his farewell address, President Dwight Eisenhower cautioned against the risk that public policy might fall under the sway of a powerful, scientific-technological elite. Scientists applying for grants often avoid challenging dominant views, knowing such dissent could hurt their chances of funding. As outlined here and here, government-backed funding can distort the integrity of scientific inquiry.

Privately funded researchers compete in the marketplace of ideas, seeking to publish their findings in competing private sector journals. While no individual is immune to corrupting forces, a competitive and open scientific public square is more likely to arrive at the truth and progress than a government monopoly, which is inescapably vulnerable to political and special interest concerns.

If Secretary Kennedy is serious about reforming science, he should focus on fostering independence and transparency, not on consolidating control. Creating government-run journals that publish only government-funded research reviewed by government-appointed editors risks transforming science into propaganda. 

The best safeguard for scientific integrity isn’t more centralization—it’s competition, open debate, and the freedom to follow the evidence wherever it may lead.

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
previous post
Netanyahu says Israel has killed Hamas’ Gaza chief Mohammed Sinwar
next post
Top Sectors to Watch + The 18 SMA Setup Every Trader Should Know

You may also like

Inflation Can Increase Capital Gains Tax Rate to...

July 25, 2025

Friday Feature: Edefy, “Pod Schooling Made Simple”

July 25, 2025

Yiwu: China’s Free-Market City

July 25, 2025

Chart Mania – 23 ATR Move in QQQ...

July 25, 2025

Man Admits to Medicaid Fraud—That’s Not the Worst...

July 25, 2025

S&P 500 Breaking Out Again: What This Means...

July 24, 2025

Momentum Leaders Are Rotating — Here’s How to...

July 24, 2025

Learning from the Caribbean CBDC Experience

July 24, 2025

States Are Streamlining Licensing—ICE Is Kicking In Windows

July 24, 2025

Is META Breaking Out or Breaking Down?

July 23, 2025

    Fill Out & Get More Relevant News


    Stay ahead of the market and unlock exclusive trading insights & timely news. We value your privacy - your information is secure, and you can unsubscribe anytime. Gain an edge with hand-picked trading opportunities, stay informed with market-moving updates, and learn from expert tips & strategies.

    Recent Posts

    • Chart Mania – 23 ATR Move in QQQ – Metals Lead 2025 – XLV Oversold – XLU Breakout – ITB Moment of Truth

      July 25, 2025
    • S&P 500 Breaking Out Again: What This Means for Your Portfolio

      July 24, 2025
    • Momentum Leaders Are Rotating — Here’s How to Find Them

      July 24, 2025
    • Is META Breaking Out or Breaking Down?

      July 23, 2025
    • A Wild Ride For the History Books: 2025 Mid-Year Recap

      July 23, 2025
    • Tech Taps the Brakes, Homebuilders Hit the Gas: See the Rotation on StockCharts Today

      July 22, 2025
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Copyright © 2025 simplesmartseminar.com | All Rights Reserved

    Simple Smart Seminar
    • Stock
    • Investing
    • Politics
    • Tech News
    • Editor’s Pick