Simple Smart Seminar
  • Stock
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Tech News
  • Editor’s Pick
Editor's PickInvesting

Ellingburg v. United States Brief: Criminal Restitution Counts as Criminal Punishment

by June 30, 2025
June 30, 2025 0 comment

Matthew Cavedon

prison

In 1995, when petitioner Holsey Ellingburg, Jr., robbed a bank, federal criminal restitution was governed by the Victim and Witness Protection Act (VWPA). The VWPA provided that a defendant’s liability to pay restitution ended twenty years after the entry of judgment. Then, in 1996, Congress enacted the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act (MVRA), which extended the liability period to twenty years after a defendant’s release from imprisonment and required that restitution include interest. The MVRA’s drafters apparently anticipated the possibility that its retroactive application might violate the Constitution’s Ex Post Facto Clause: Congress explicitly made the Act retroactive only “to the extent constitutionally permissible.”

The issue in this case is whether that concern was correct. 
Holsey Ellingburg’s sentence included just shy of 27 years’ imprisonment and $7,567.25 in restitution. He paid $2,054.04 toward this during the twenty years authorized by the VWPA. In the past three years, he has returned to society, living with his fiancée and trying to make ends meet. However, his probation officer maintains that he still has to make $100 monthly restitution payments, and the government says he now owes $13,476.01 total—almost twice as much as his sentence originally imposed and far more than he owed at the close of the VWPA restitution period.
Ellingburg sought judicial relief. The district court held that the MVRA’s extension of the restitution period did not increase his punishment. The Eighth Circuit instead applied its own precedent holding that criminal restitution is not subject to the Ex Post Facto Clause at all because it is a civil remedy rather than a criminal punishment. Two of the three panel members wrote a concurring opinion criticizing this precedent, but the Eighth Circuit denied rehearing en banc.
After the Supreme Court granted Ellingburg’s cert petition, the government decided not to defend the Eighth Circuit’s decision and to instead file a brief in support of Ellingburg. Cato and the Fines and Fees Justice Center are pleased to file a brief that joins the parties in asking the Court to vacate the decision. 
Criminal restitution is punishment under the Court’s modern precedent. Historical authorities support this conclusion. While those are adequate reasons to rule in Ellingburg’s favor, the Court should also revive a broader understanding of what qualifies as criminal punishment more broadly, revisiting issues like sex-offender registration, monetary penalties, and civil asset forfeiture.
0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
previous post
This Harm Reduction Innovation Is Already Saving Lives
next post
CAFE Standards

You may also like

Friday Feature: Gilmer’s Learning Solutions

September 12, 2025

How Many Arrests Were Made? FinCEN Director Doesn’t...

September 12, 2025

Three Things You Should Know About the Record...

September 12, 2025

Politically Motivated Violence Is Rare in the United...

September 11, 2025

SOAR Act Update Could Unlock More Scholarship Funds...

September 11, 2025

The Toxic Legacy of 9/11…and How to End...

September 11, 2025

Trump Industrial Policy Delivers Make-Work Jobs

September 11, 2025

The President Should Not Have a License to...

September 10, 2025

Are Neoliberalism and Globalization Undermining Democracy?

September 10, 2025

The Latest National Test Scores: More Bad Productivity...

September 9, 2025

    Fill Out & Get More Relevant News


    Stay ahead of the market and unlock exclusive trading insights & timely news. We value your privacy - your information is secure, and you can unsubscribe anytime. Gain an edge with hand-picked trading opportunities, stay informed with market-moving updates, and learn from expert tips & strategies.

    Recent Posts

    • Chart Mania – 23 ATR Move in QQQ – Metals Lead 2025 – XLV Oversold – XLU Breakout – ITB Moment of Truth

      July 25, 2025
    • S&P 500 Breaking Out Again: What This Means for Your Portfolio

      July 24, 2025
    • Momentum Leaders Are Rotating — Here’s How to Find Them

      July 24, 2025
    • Is META Breaking Out or Breaking Down?

      July 23, 2025
    • A Wild Ride For the History Books: 2025 Mid-Year Recap

      July 23, 2025
    • Tech Taps the Brakes, Homebuilders Hit the Gas: See the Rotation on StockCharts Today

      July 22, 2025
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Copyright © 2025 simplesmartseminar.com | All Rights Reserved

    Simple Smart Seminar
    • Stock
    • Investing
    • Politics
    • Tech News
    • Editor’s Pick