Simple Smart Seminar
  • Stock
  • Investing
  • Politics
  • Tech News
  • Editor’s Pick
Politics

Federal judge hits DOJ for ‘indict first, investigate later’ approach in court hearing

by November 6, 2025
November 6, 2025 0 comment

A federal judge criticized the Justice Department for allegedly being too quick to indict in high-profile cases on Wednesday.

Magistrate Judge William Fitzpatrick of the Eastern District of Virginia made the comments during a brief hearing regarding the case against former FBI Director James Comey.

‘Right now, we are in a bit of a feeling of indict first, investigate later,’ Fitzpatrick said in the hearing, which lasted less than an hour.

Fitzpatrick questioned prosecutors about their handling of data acquired from a number of search warrants between 2019 and 2020, information which is now being used in Comey’s case. The judge pressed prosecutors on whether they may have viewed information that may be protected by attorney-client privilege.

Fitzpatrick also noted the size of the trove of documents, saying Comey’s defense team has been placed at a disadvantage with a limited time to view the set.

‘The government has had this for five and a half years … this is an unfair burden the government is placing on the defense, but I don’t see another path forward,’ the judge said.

Comey’s team has sought to have his case dismissed, arguing he is the victim of selective prosecution by President Donald Trump.

The DOJ denied in a 48-page filing that Trump’s September Truth Social post calling on U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi to prosecute prominent political adversaries, including Comey, Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and New York Attorney General Letitia James, had any influence on the decision to bring charges.

‘These posts reflect the President’s view that the defendant has committed crimes that should be met with prosecution. They may even suggest that the President disfavors the defendant. But they are not direct evidence of a vindictive motive,’ prosecutors argued.

‘The defendant spins a tale that requires leaps of logic and a big dose of cynicism, then he calls the President’s post a direct admission,’ they continued. ‘There is no direct admission of discriminatory purpose. To the contrary, the only direct admission from the President is that DOJ officials decided whether to prosecute, not him.’

Fox News’ Ashley Carnahan contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail
previous post
House conservatives back new funding deal to end shutdown, reject ‘wasteful’ Obamacare subsidies
next post
Tillis Targets Debanking

You may also like

GREGG JARRETT: No, Trump’s order to snatch Maduro...

January 5, 2026

Trump issues direct warning to Venezuela’s new leader...

January 4, 2026

Trump and Musk share ‘lovely dinner’ at Mar-a-Lago...

January 4, 2026

Venezuela still owes US energy companies billions as...

January 4, 2026

JONATHAN TURLEY: Why Trump went off script on...

January 4, 2026

Dan Bongino officially leaves FBI deputy director role...

January 4, 2026

JONATHAN TURLEY: Maduro operation was legal, but Trump...

January 4, 2026

Venezuelan dissident outlines risks and opportunities as Venezuela...

January 4, 2026

Kamala Harris blasts Trump administration’s capture of Venezuela’s...

January 4, 2026

Rubio to Cuba: ‘I’d be concerned’ after US...

January 3, 2026

    Fill Out & Get More Relevant News


    Stay ahead of the market and unlock exclusive trading insights & timely news. We value your privacy - your information is secure, and you can unsubscribe anytime. Gain an edge with hand-picked trading opportunities, stay informed with market-moving updates, and learn from expert tips & strategies.

    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Copyright © 2025 simplesmartseminar.com | All Rights Reserved

    Simple Smart Seminar
    • Stock
    • Investing
    • Politics
    • Tech News
    • Editor’s Pick